Thought action fusion can it be corrected

View 5 excerpts, cites background and results. Childhood trauma and thought action fusion: A multi-method examination. Abstract Cognitive biases, such as Thought Action Fusion, play a crucial role in the cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety disorders and have been shown to prospectively increase the risk of … Expand. My Child's thoughts frighten me: Maladaptive effects associated with parents' interpretation and management of children's intrusive thoughts.

Parent-level risk factors for children's obsessive beliefs, interpretation biases, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A cross-sectional examination. The relationship between religion and thought-action fusion: use of an in vivo paradigm. View 2 excerpts, references background. Thought-action fusion: review of the literature and future directions. Thought-action fusion TAF is the tendency for individuals to assume that certain thoughts either imply the immorality of their character or increase the likelihood of catastrophic events.

The … Expand. View 1 excerpt, references background. Moral thought-action fusion and OCD symptoms: the moderating role of religious affiliation. The thought-action fusion scale: further evidence for its reliability and validity. Is thought-action fusion related to religiosity? Differences between Christians and Jews.

View 1 excerpt. The correlation between thought-action fusion and religiosity in a normal sample. View 3 excerpts, references background. Thought action fusion: can it be corrected? Multiple pathways to inflated responsibility beliefs in obsessional problems: possible origins and implications for therapy and research. The purpose of this paper is to consider the possible origins of an inflated sense of responsibility which occupies an important place in the cognitive theory of obsessive compulsive disorder … Expand.

Highly Influential. The role of cognitive factors in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: a prospective study. Related Papers. These specific metacognitive variables were chosen due to their outstanding special relationship with OCD Bortolon et al. These mediational results are compatible with the hypothesis that the metacognitive beliefs assessed with the MCQ are more complex cognitive factors, developed subsequent to previous cognitive factors such as TAF or magical thinking and, in turn, their development could ultimately lead to the performance of dysfunctional strategies that promote and maintain OCD symptomatology.

For this study, we formed three groups of patients diagnosed with various disorders according to Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders — fourth edition revised APA, criteria.

We were especially careful to rule out potential participants who presented with any other comorbid disorder; however, the group reflects the characteristic heterogeneity of OCDs. We excluded patients who had previously been diagnosed with OCD. Participants who were receiving psychoactive medication or psychological treatment were excluded from the study. Patients with OCD and those in the clinical-control group were receiving attention as outpatients from various psychologists.

None of them was being treated with antipsychotic medication although, in some cases, they were receiving benzodiazepines or antidepressants. The MCQ is a item questionnaire rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 4 strongly agree.

Factorial analysis carried out by the authors yielded five empirically differentiated and relatively stable factors: cognitive confidence, positive beliefs, cognitive self-consciousness, uncontrollability and danger negative beliefs , and need to control thoughts.

The MCQ has shown good internal consistency, convergent validity, and acceptable test-retest reliability. The TAF is a item instrument rated on 5-point Likert-type scale that assesses psychological fusion of thoughts and actions in the following three subscales: TAF-Moral e.

Thus, we selected two translators, one familiar with the Spanish culture and another with that of the USA, and used the back-translation method; that is, the first translator translated into Spanish, and this translation was then translated back into English by the second translator.

In this study, the alpha for the global scale was. This classic questionnaire is widely used to measure OCD symptomatology. After obtaining the research ethics committee's approval, all patients were assessed with semi-structured interviews to verify whether at that time they met the DSM-IV-TR APA, diagnostic criteria for their group. Prior to application, all participants had provided their informed consent, after which they completed the three questionnaires in the order described above.

Participants were encouraged to ask questions about any of the items that raised doubts. The patient's usual psychologist conducted the interview and administered the tests. The participants were not paid or rewarded. First, we compared the mean scores in the variables of interest in the three groups OCD, clinical-control group, and nonclinical group by means of analyses or multivariate analyses of variance. For the last objective, we conducted parallel multiple mediation analyses in each group, using the nonparametric bootstrapping procedure for estimating direct and indirect effects with the model described by Preacher and Hayes This effect size can be interpreted as the expected change in the dependent variable i.

Following Kenny and Judd's suggestion, small, medium, and large effect sizes would be, respectively,. Therefore, in this case, data were analyzed using Welch's test. To analyze possible statistically significant group differences in the metacognitive variables, we carried out a MANOVA, in which the participant's group was a fixed factor, and scores in the different MCQ factors or in the MCQ-Total were dependent variables.

MCQ scores of clinical and nonclinical groups compared with the nonclinical sample from the original study. MCQ Metacognitions Questionnaire. TAFS scores of clinical and nonclinical groups compared with samples from the original study. NA: data not available. When a significant difference was found p.

However, there were no statistically significant differences between the OCD and the clinical-control group. Adjusted mean shown. Values sharing the same letter are significantly different, based on Bonferroni's correction. Stepwise method was used to perform the regression. Multiple regression analysis for MOCI each group. Method: Stepwise. As seen in Table 5 , the factor with the most weight to account for OCD symptoms was negative beliefs.

Tables 6—8 show the data concerning the parallel multiple mediation analyses conducted to analyze the mediator role of metacognitive variables negative beliefs and need to control as measured by the MCQ in the effect of TAF and each of its three factors on OCD symptoms. This study hypothesized that patients with OCD and the clinical-control group are characterized by a higher degree of TAF and other metacognitive beliefs than the nonclinical group.

This hypothesis was not confirmed. As shown in the comparative tables Tables 2 and 3 , the metacognition scores are fairly high in all three groups compared with the original study. In this regard, the observation of almost no group differences in OCD symptoms Table 4 leads to questioning whether the random composition of the participant group of this study may have been notably biased toward the obsessive pole.

Future studies would help clarify whether such bias actually occurred. Secondly, it was considered that metacognitive beliefs and the TAF could both predict a predisposition to OCD symptoms, understood as a continuous variable present to a greater or lesser extent in all the participants.

In this sense, the metacognitive negative beliefs factor was observed to be the main predictor of OCD symptomatology. This variable was shown to be relevant in previous studies Bortolon et al. Thirdly, in order to understand the functioning of variables related to OCD, this study examined the hypothesis that the effects of TAF on OCD symptoms would be mediated by metacognitive beliefs.

This hypothesis was partially confirmed. In general, as expected, these mediational findings are compatible with the hypothesis that certain metacognitive beliefs emerge after the development of other cognitive factors such as TAF or magical thinking. In fact, in support of these findings, Table 3 shows that, in the original study, the obsessive groups obtained higher scores in TAF than those corresponding to nonclinical adults—this is a salient finding.

Thus, according to our hypothesis, TAF evolves toward more complex beliefs e. The implications of the findings presented and discussed herein for the development of psychological interventions should be treated with caution. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to propose preventive strategies that could limit the development of certain metacognitive beliefs and, therefore, OCD symptomatology.

In particular, strategies aimed at allowing patients with OCD symptomatology to reduce the importance of the power and danger of thoughts. This study presents a major limitation in its cross-sectional design, which does not allow determining whether changes in the predictor variables i.

This study has some additional limitations. First, as all data in this study were obtained using self-report measures, relationships among variables might be artificially inflated.

Second, the size of samples of the study should be taken into account when observing significant effects of the assessed variables. Third, the description of the OCD symptomatology group, due to the failure to include variables such as severity, duration, etc.

Fifth, the choice of the clinical-control group with diverse symptomatology can limit the results because it does not capture the specific behavior of the variables in a more homogeneous group.

Sixth, the results focused only on the mediation of two metacognitive variables, thereby ignoring the possible mediational role of other metacognitive variables. A future study replicating and extending the present findings would support the S-REF model of OCD and the central role of certain metacognitive beliefs in its development and maintenance. From this perspective, these metacognitive beliefs activate the specific pattern of thinking CAS that leads to a series of unsuccessful strategies such as behavioral avoidance, thought suppression, worry, rumination, or excessive attention to thoughts and feelings.

This is problematic as it extends negative thinking, leads to reduced attentional flexibility, and a failure to exercise appropriate control over negative experiences Wells, Lastly — in line with the other third-generation treatments of anxiety disorders see reviews in Bluett et al. The mediating role of metacognitive variables in the relationship between Thought-Action Fusion and obsessive-compulsive symptomatology.

Descargar PDF. Autor para correspondencia. Under a Creative Commons license. Table 1. Characteristics of the groups.. Table 2. MCQ scores of clinical and nonclinical groups compared with the nonclinical sample from the original study.. Table 3. TAFS scores of clinical and nonclinical groups compared with samples from the original study.. Table 6. Table 7. Table 8. It is generally concluded that certain beliefs, such as TAF, can evolve toward more complex metacognitive beliefs, which ultimately lead to the development of OCD symptoms.

Palabras clave:. Texto completo. Method Participants For this study, we formed three groups of patients diagnosed with various disorders according to Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders — fourth edition revised APA, criteria. Characteristics of the groups. Cognitive confidence Positive beliefs Cognitive self-consciousness Negative beliefs Need to control Table 4. Table 5. Paths Regression analyses Size effect Coeff. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.

Psiquis, 7 , pp. Bluett, K. Homan, K. Morrison, M. Levin, M. Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety and OCD spectrum disorders: An empirical review. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28 , pp. Bortolon, F. Stephan, D. Capdevielle, H.

Yazbek, J. Boulenger, …, S. Further insight into the role of metacognitive beliefs in schizophrenia and OCD patients: Testing a mediation model. Psychiatry Research, 15 , pp. Cartwright-Hatton, A. Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The metacognitions questionnaire and its correlates.

Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11 , pp. Cucchi, V. Bottelli, D. Cavadini, L. Ricci, V. Conca, P. Ronchi, E.

An explorative study on metacognition in obsessive-compulsive disorder and panic disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53 , pp. Einstein, R. Does magical thinking improve across treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder?. Behaviour Change, 25 , pp. Elif, D. Basaran, D. Hilal, S. Ali Emre.

Thought-Action Fusion: Is it present in schizophrenia?. Cuevas-Yust, O. The role of magical thinking in hallucinations.